The Economic Freedom Fighters of Swaziland understands that It takes a leadership be-reft of universally accepted ethics to design a constitution to favour himself only and his family and his house negroes, who are merely praise singers. It takes a leadership devoid of universally accepted ethics to place himself above any law, so to never be questioned even when spending 47 million on useless aeroplanes when tertiary students haven't received a single penny in allowances. On the Dialogue issue, The first cardinal pillar of the EFF places dialogue at the centre of all our developmental objectives, it clearly state that we want to democratize the country through Dialogue and any other revolutionary means necessary, as our aim is to capture state power. In the EFF founding manifesto it identifies the need to contest state power decisively, in order to deliver service to our people. (Our people are the motive forces that stands to benefit from the victories of the revolution), so that means as EFF we are open to any dialogue that is meant to democratize the country, as we want a Multi Party system of governance not a one party state because to us Tinkhundla are no longer centres where The Nguni people would meet and discuss community issue but they are Structured as a Political ideology and political party itself, if so let that be put to a test by competing in the ballot with other political parties. The idea of boycotting every strategic activity needs to be revisited, what gains have we achieved by that posture? but it have given the enemy of the people time and platforms to stabilize in the strategic sectors of the country be it in legislation (where he passes any laws to advance his interest without any opposition, as parliamentarians are nothing but praise singers), judiciary,(as the mornachy is above the law) executive,(as he even appoint kids to be ministers and principal secretaries) even in business in all these sectors tinkhundla needs an opposition. Many of our people remain skeptical around this issue even those who pride themselves on superior logic and science as a guiding tool of analysis. As Marxists we believe in dialects, and this means that at the core of our belief system is evidence based and scientific logic, to determine the correct outcome of conflicting ideas. The existing disagreement around the sibaya issue cannot be based on emotions or irrational fear, it must be supported by scientific evidence, not fear-mongering. The arguments against this issue do not hold when you put them through a political test and scientific interrogation. An an organisation we invite inputs and views on this issue to be shared via our Email. officialeffswaziland@gmail.com The views must be substantiated with reasons on why we should not and if we should why. As the EFF we can participate in a dialogue where the people are represented under political formations and civil organisation's, we also want the incarcerated Members of parliament to be released and all political exiles to return. We also want the proceedings to be overseen by a renowned neutral body, not the tinkhundla government itself as it is not in the interest of justice to be a player and a referee at the same time. The EFF have been waiting patiently for the promises by the chairman of the SADC Troika organ, he promised a dialogue which we are still waiting for its Terms of Reference as one cannot have dialogue without any Terms of reference which needs to be agreed upon by both entities. For views forward an email to: officialeffswaziland@gmail.com
